[ad_1]
Two days after complaining about what she saw as race discrimination to superiors, Smith said in the lawsuit she was “given menial work that the other white coworkers were not” while at a political conference in Houston last year. At the conference, organized by Andrew Yang’s Forward Party, Smith alleges that she was chastised for being late in delivering No Labels-branded cookies that had been made for the event.
“Plaintiff got the cookies and arrived at the venue — which was 8 minutes away — and [No Labels vice president Samantha] Brooks continued to make jokes at Plaintiff’s expense, while [No Labels senior adviser] Holly Page (‘Page’) chastised Plaintiff, telling her to get to work, while the rest of Plaintiff’s white coworkers sat at the table,” the lawsuit says.
POLITICO first reported Smith’s allegations late last year although not by name. But she has now publicly revealed her identity and is asking for lost wages, “pain and suffering” and the loss of health insurance (which Smith said is more than $10,000), an unspecified amount of punitive damages and reimbursement of attorneys fees. The lawsuit was filed on Aug. 4 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
No Labels is laying the groundwork for running a third-party independent presidential candidate next year, an effort that has led many Democrats to criticize the group for potentially becoming a spoiler that could help Donald Trump.
“The legal action initiated against No Labels is without merit, and we are fully committed to vigorously defending our position in the court of law. This lawsuit comes amid a partisan agenda being unleashed against No Labels by an elite network of anti-democracy Democrats,” No Labels co-executive director Liz Morrison said in a statement to POLITICO. In POLITICO’s initial story, White had said No Labels would not pay “a dime” in any possible suit.
Page declined to comment. Brooks and Jacobson did not respond to requests for comment.
In No Labels’ formal answer to the complaint, the organization denied that Smith’s race had anything to do with how she was treated and denied retaliating against her.
“All actions taken by No Labels with respect to Plaintiff were based upon legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons, and no unlawful factor motivated No Labels in its decision-making regarding Plaintiff’s contract,” No Labels said in its response. “No Labels applied its policies, procedures, and practices without regard to Plaintiff’s race or any complaint.”
The organization said Smith did not meet No Labels’ “legitimate expectations” in her roles at the organization. “Though she was expected to support and build teams as outlined in her contract, she was not sufficiently responsive, failed to recruit attendees for meetings, and even failed to attend many of the meetings she set up,” No Labels said.
And No Labels denied that Smith was reprimanded for not hitting performance targets because she had to attend a family funeral. But they did admit several elements of Smith’s allegations.
“No Labels admits that on or around August 10, 2022 Jacobson requested that Plaintiff assist with diversity recruitment efforts, including African American recruits,” No Labels’ lawyer said.
The organization also said that a number of aspects of her recounting of the cookie episode were accurate, although they also said that Smith arrived late to the conference in Houston and left early.
“No Labels admits that in September 2022 Plaintiff was asked to take ownership for certain aspects of No Labels’ involvement at the conference including recruiting volunteers to attend, managing the RSVPs for the No Labels event, and coordinating the cookie delivery from a local bakery,” No Labels said in its response.
[ad_2]
Source link
