[ad_1]
Matias, J. N., Szalavitz, S. & Zuckerman, E. FollowBias: supporting behavior change toward gender equality by networked gatekeepers on social media. In Proc. 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (eds Lee, S. & Poltrock, S.) 1082–1095 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2017).
Peng, H., Lakhani, K. & Teplitskiy, M. Acceptance in top journals shows large disparities across name-inferred ethnicities. Preprint at SocArXiv https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/mjbxg (2021).
Hofstra, B. & de Schipper, N. C. Predicting ethnicity with first names in online social media networks. Big Data Soc. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718761141 (2018).
King, M. M., Bergstrom, C. T., Correll, S. J., Jacquet, J. & West, J. D. Men set their own cites high: gender and self-citation across fields and over time. Socius https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117738903 (2017).
Mihaljević, H., Tullney, M., Santamaría, L. & Steinfeldt, C. Reflections on gender analyses of bibliographic corpora. Front. Big Data https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00029 (2019).
Keyes, O. The misgendering machines. In Proc. ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (eds Karahalios, K., Monroy-Hernández, A., Lampinen, A. & Fitzpatrick, G.) 1–22 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2018).
D’Ignazio, C. A Primer on Non-Binary Gender and Big Data (MIT Center for Civic Media, 2016); https://civic.mit.edu/index.html%3Fp=1165.html
Borch, C. & Pardo-Gurrera, J. P. (eds) Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Machine Learning (Oxford Univ. Press, 2023).
Santamaría, L. & Mihaljević, H. Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 4, e156 (2018).
Lindsay, J. & Dempsey, D. First names and social distinction: middle-class naming practices in Australia. J. Sociol. 53, 577–591 (2017).
Bertrand, M. & Mullainathan, S. Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Am. Econ. Rev. 94, 991–1013 (2004).
Fosch-Villaronga, E., Poulsen, A., Søraa, R. A. & Custers, B. H. M. A little bird told me your gender: gender inferences in social media. Inf. Process. Manag. 58, 102541 (2021).
Van Buskirk, I., Clauset, A. & Larremore, D. B. An open-source cultural consensus approach to name-based gender classification. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.01714 (2022).
West, C. & Zimmerman, D. H. Doing gender. Gend. Soc. 1, 125–151 (1987).
Bonilla-Silva, E. The essential social fact of race. Am. Sociol. Rev. 64, 899–906 (1999).
Seguin, C., Julien, C. & Zhang, Y. The stability of androgynous names: dynamics of gendered naming practices in the United States 1880–2016. Poetics 85, 101501 (2021).
Fryer, R. G. Jr. & Levitt, S. D. The causes and consequences of distinctively black names. Q. J. Econ. 119, 767–805 (2004).
Jensen, J. L. et al. Language models in sociological research: an application to classifying large administrative data and measuring religiosity. Sociol. Methodol. 52, 30–52 (2022).
Lieberson, S., Dumais, S. & Baumann, S. The instability of androgynous names: the symbolic maintenance of gender boundaries. Am. J. Sociol. 105, 1249–1287 (2000).
Kozlowski, D. et al. Avoiding bias when inferring race using name-based approaches. PLoS ONE 17, e0264270 (2022).
Sebo, P. Using genderize.io to infer the gender of first names: how to improve the accuracy of the inference. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 109, 609–612 (2021).
Müller, D., Te, Y.-F. & Jain, P. Improving data quality through high precision gender categorization. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (eds Baeza-Yeats, R., Hu, X. T. & Kepner, J.) 2628–2636 (IEEE, 2017).
Wang, Z. et al. Demographic inference and representative population estimates from multilingual social media data. In The World Wide Web Conference (eds Liu, L. & Whyte, R.) 2056–2067 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2019).
Silva, G. C., Trivedi, A. N. & Gutman, R. Developing and evaluating methods to impute race/ethnicity in an incomplete dataset. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Methodol. 19, 175–195 (2019).
Mateos, P. A review of name-based ethnicity classification methods and their potential in population studies. Popul. Space Place 13, 243–263 (2007).
Barber, M. & Argyle, L. Misclassification and bias in predictions of individual ethnicity from administrative records. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. (Forthcoming).
ASA membership (American Sociological Association, 2021); https://www.asanet.org/academic-professional-resources/data-about-discipline/asa-membership
Kessler, S. J. & McKenna, W. Gender: an Ethnomethodological Approach (Univ. Chicago Press, 1985).
Pascoe, C. J. Dude, You’re a Fag: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School (Univ. California Press, 2007).
McNamarah, C. T. Misgendering. Calif. Law Rev. 109, 2227–2322 (2021).
Lagos, D. Hearing gender: voice-based gender classification processes and transgender health inequality. Am. Sociol. Rev. 84, 801–827 (2019).
Browne, K. Genderism and the bathroom problem: (re)materialising sexed sites, (re)creating sexed bodies. Gend. Place Cult. 11, 331–346 (2004).
Whitley, C. T., Nordmarken, S., Kolysh, S. & Goldstein-Kral, J. I’ve been misgendered so many times: comparing the experiences of chronic misgendering among transgender graduate students in the social and natural sciences. Sociol. Inq. 92, 1001–1028 (2022).
The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1979); https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html
Hamidi, F., Scheuerman, M. K. & Branham, S. M. Gender recognition or gender reductionism?: The social implications of embedded gender recognition systems. In Proc. 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (eds Hancock, M. & Mandryk, R.) 1–13 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2018).
Scheuerman, M. K., Pape, M. & Hanna, A. Auto-essentialization: gender in automated facial analysis as extended colonial project. Big Data Soc. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211053712 (2021).
Bourg, C. Gender Mistakes and Inequality (Stanford Univ. Press, 2003).
Davis, G. & Preves, S. Intersex and the social construction of sex. Contexts 16, 80 (2017).
Fausto-Sterling, A. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality (Basic Books, 2000).
Lockhart, J. W. Paradigms of sex research and women in STEM. Gend. Soc. 35, 449–475 (2021).
Science must respect the dignity and rights of all humans. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 1029–1031 (2022).
Slater, R. B. The blacks who first entered the world of white higher education. J. Blacks High. Educ. 4, 47–56 (1994).
Blumenfeld, W. J. On the discursive construction of Jewish “racialization” and “race passing:” Jews as “U-boats” with a mysterious “queer light”. J. Crit. Thought Prax. 1, 2 (2012).
Nakamura, L. Cyberrace. PMLA 123, 1673–1682 (2008).
Sims, J. P. Reevaluation of the influence of appearance and reflected appraisals for mixed-race identity: the role of consistent inconsistent racial perception. Sociol. Race Ethn. 2, 569–583 (2016).
Buolamwini, J. & Gebru, T. Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Proc. 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ed. Barocas, S.) 1–15 (ACM, 2018).
Tzioumis, K. Demographic aspects of first names. Sci. Data 5, 180025 (2018).
Di Bitetti, M. S. & Ferreras, J. A. Publish (in English) or perish: the effect on citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific publications. Ambio 46, 121–127 (2017).
Garcia, P. et al. No: critical refusal as feminist data practice. In Proc. 2020 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (eds Bietz, M. & Wiggins, A.) 199–202 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2020).
Caplan, R., Donovan, J., Hanson, L. & Matthews, J. Algorithmic Accountability: a Primer (Data & Society, 2018); https://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/DandS_Algorithmic_Accountability.pdf
Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S. & Kirchner, L. Machine Bias (ProPublica, 2016); https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing
Harcourt, B. E. Risk as a proxy for race: the dangers of risk assessment. Fed. Sentencing Rep. 27, 237–243 (2015).
Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J. & Narayanan, A. Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science 356, 183–186 (2017).
Eubanks, V. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (St. Martin’s Press, 2017).
O’Neil, C. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (Allen Lane, 2016).
Benjamin, R. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code (Polity Press, 2019).
Genderize.io. Determine the gender of a name; https://genderize.io/
Mullen, L., Blevins, C. & Schmidt, B. gender: predict gender from names using historical data http://cran.nexr.com/web/packages/gender/README.html (2021).
Kaplan, J. predictrace: predict the race and gender of a given name using census and Social Security Administration data. GitHub https://github.com/jacobkap/predictrace (2021).
Laohaprapanon, S., Sood, G. & Naji, B. appeler/ethnicolor: impute race and ethnicity based on name. GitHub https://github.com/appeler/ethnicolor (2022).
Khanna, K., Bertelsen, B., Olivella, S., Rosenman, E. & Imai, K. wru: who are you? Bayesian prediction of racial category using surname, first name, middle name, and geolocation. GitHub https://github.com/kosukeimai/wru (2022).
[ad_2]
Source link
